recent

Titulo

British 'Blackhair' Magazine Puts White Model on the Cover


A British beauty magazine that bills itself as "The Black Woman's Style Bible" say it inadvertently put a white woman on the cover of the latest issue.

The model, Emily Bador, pointed out the error in an Instagram post. She apologized for the mix-up. Bador's statement was actually quite impressive. She laid out the issues with her occupying a space that should have been one of few reserved exclusively for Black women.

“I hold up my hands,” Bador wrote. “I’m so so so sorry and I’m very sorry this cover was taken away from a black woman.”

Bador is wearing a kinky hair style and says the photo was taken years ago when she was "uneducated" about the struggles Black women face.

"Growing up in a very very white city, I had no idea the struggles black women face and how often they were persecuted for their hair," she explained. "I didn't understand how black women are constantly told their natural hair is inappropriate/unprofessional for the work place, or how young girls are told they can't go to school with natural hair."
I would deeply and sincerely like to apologise to every one for this, and black women especially. I would like to clarify, I believe this shoot is from when I was around 15 and didn't understand cultural appropriation or the impact it has on POC. I was uneducated, which obviously is no excuse, ignorant and immature. Growing up in a very very white city, I had no idea the struggles black women face and how often they were persecuted for their hair. I didn't understand how black women are constantly told their natural hair is inappropriate/unprofessional for the work place, or how young girls are told they can't go to school with natural hair. I didn't understand that shoots like this support the very Eurocentric beauty standard that the mainstream media focus on which reinforce the idea that black features are only ok on white women. I didn't understand that as a white passing woman I'd be praised for this hair, but if I was a black woman I'd be persecuted. I didn't understand cultural appropriation. ✨ I do regret doing this. I hold up my hands, I'm so so so sorry and I'm very sorry this cover was taken away from a black woman. This image is (I think, although I'm not 100% sure) about 3/4 years old, it was never intended to be on the cover of this magazine. If I had known it was going to be published, I would never have condoned it. I'm upset and angry I was never asked by the photographer/hair salon/anyone if this image could be used for the cover Black Hair. ✨ I'm so glad I've educated myself and surrounded my self with people to teach me what is right and wrong. I constantly am learning and becoming more and more informed. It's important to come forward and be honest with ourselves about our past mistakes, otherwise we will never learn. Again, I'm truly, deeply sorry to anyone I've offended and I hope if nothing else this post can educated others so they don't make similar mistakes. (also please let me know if I've said anything wrong or offensive in this post!!! or anything i can add!!!! i love u all sm and the last thing i want to do is offend or hurt any one, i really hope you don't all think im a massive twat 😔)
A photo posted by e m i l y bador (@darth_bador) on

Now, of course, the real question is how did the publishers of the magazine let this happen. Editor Keysha Davis issued a short statement on the mistake via Instagram.

Dear Readers/Supporters

It was recently brought to our attention that the model gracing our December/January issue is not of black or mixed-race heritage. We were obviously not aware of this prior to selecting the image. We often ask PR companies/salons to submit images for the magazine, specifically stating that models must be Black or mixed race. We can only take their word for it, and of course, try to use our own judgment.

At Blackhair we continuously strive to celebrate black women in all our beautiful variation of skin hues and hair textures. We are only too aware of how black women are underrepresented in the mainstream media and the last thing we want to do is add to our erasure. In this ever-changing world, race will surely become even more fluid and no doubt conversations around black identity will continue to change, and we definitely welcome the dialogue.
Dear Readers/Supporters It was recently brought to our attention that the model gracing our December/January issue is not of black or mixed-race heritage. We were obviously not aware of this prior to selecting the image. We often ask PR companies/salons to submit images for the magazine, specifically stating that models must be Black or mixed race. We can only take their word for it, and of course, try to use our own judgment. At Blackhair we continuously strive to celebrate black women in all our beautiful variation of skin hues and hair textures. We are only too aware of how black women are underrepresented in the mainstream media and the last thing we want to do is add to our erasure. In this ever-changing world, race will surely become even more fluid and no doubt conversations around black identity will continue to change, and we definitely welcome the dialogue. Thank you to Emily Bador for bringing this to our attention, we really appreciate your honesty. And we also thank our dear readers for the continued support, we don’t take any of it for granted and therefore welcome any emails, messages, tweets you have on this subject and others. Enjoy your Monday Keysha Blackhair Editor
A photo posted by Blackhair Magazine (@blackhairmags) on

Mistakes happen, but we can't help but think about how colorism contributes to these kinds of issues. Too often ambiguously Black women are used to represent Black womanhood. Perhaps this is a lesson to go with a darker-skinned model whose Blackness is less often celebrated.


Powered by Blogger.